This opinion piece shows how similar the angry debate about immigrants is to the debate of the 1700s. And our history shows that those angry people were wrong. - - Donna Poisl
By Jeb Bush and Robert D. Putnam
On our national birthday, and amid an angry debate about immigration, Americans should reflect on the lessons of our shared immigrant past. We must recall that the challenges facing our nation today were felt as far back as the Founders' time. Immigrant assimilation has always been slow and contentious, with progress measured not in years but in decades. Yet there are steps communities and government should take to form a more cohesive, successful union.
Consider what one leader wrote in 1753: "Few of their children in the country learn English. The signs in our streets have inscriptions in both languages. . . . Unless the stream of their importation could be turned . . . they will soon so outnumber us that we will not preserve our language, and even our government will become precarious." Thus Ben Franklin referred to German Americans, still the largest ethnic group in America.
Click on the headline above to read the rest of this story! This is only a small part of it.
1 comment:
"In short unless the stream of their importation could be turned from this to other colonies, as you very judiciously propose, they will soon so out number us, that all the advantages we have will not in My Opinion be able to preserve our language, and even our Government will become precarious."
Franklin seems to be talking about diverting them to other colonies, not denying them the ability to immigrate as the author somehow proposes. The argument could also be made for limited immigration so that the immigrants themselves assimilate into their new culture and adopt their new homelands vs overtaking the new homeland and changing it into what they just left.
Post a Comment