While many people keep insisting this country is full and no immigrants should be allowed, others are showing proof the opposite is true. And other states are having the same problem as Connecticut. DP
By Rick Green
courant.com: The one thing that saved us from losing population during the first half of this decade was the continuing stream of immigrants coming to Connecticut looking for a better life.
That's why the latest news out of the U.S. Census Bureau is worrisome. Without them, economists and business leaders say, we are dead.
The latest figures show that Connecticut is now losing population, which may not surprise folks out there who can't afford the taxes and can't find a job that pays enough. This time, newly arriving foreign-born immigrants - legal and illegal - aren't going to save us.
The state's population dropped to 3,502,309 in 2007, down 2,500 people. At the same time, the number of foreign-born immigrants also dropped by roughly the same amount - 2,697.
It's a very small change that may signal a dangerous trend.
"We are dead without immigrants in this state,'' said Peter Goia, vice president and economist at the Connecticut Business and Industry Association. "The only growth we are going to get is from immigration. If the immigrants go negative, we are going to have a declining population."
Be sure to read the rest of this story! This is only a small part of it.
1 comment:
Donna, with all due respect, any economic model that relies upon never-ending population growth is obviously doomed to failure since never-ending population growth is impossible.
Rampant population growth threatens our economy and quality of life. Immigration, both legal and illegal, are fueling this growth.
I'm not talking just about the obvious problems that we see in the news - growing dependence on foreign oil, carbon emissions, soaring commodity prices, environmental degradation, etc. I'm talking about the effect upon rising unemployment and poverty in America.
I should introduce myself. I am the author of a book titled "Five Short Blasts: A New Economic Theory Exposes The Fatal Flaw in Globalization and Its Consequences for America." To make a long story short, my theory is that, as population density rises beyond some optimum level, per capita consumption of products begins to decline out of the need to conserve space. People who live in crowded conditions simply don’t have enough space to use and store many products. This declining per capita consumption, in the face of rising productivity (per capita output, which always rises), inevitably yields rising unemployment and poverty.
This theory has huge implications for U.S. policy toward population management, especially immigration policy. Our policies of encouraging high rates of immigration are rooted in the belief of economists that population growth is a good thing, fueling economic growth. Through most of human history, the interests of the common good and business (corporations) were both well-served by continuing population growth. For the common good, we needed more workers to man our factories, producing the goods needed for a high standard of living. This population growth translated into sales volume growth for corporations. Both were happy.
But, once an optimum population density is breached, their interests diverge. It is in the best interest of the common good to stabilize the population, avoiding an erosion of our quality of life through high unemployment and poverty. However, it is still in the interest of corporations to fuel population growth because, even though per capita consumption goes into decline, total consumption still increases. We now find ourselves in the position of having corporations and economists influencing public policy in a direction that is not in the best interest of the common good.
The U.N. ranks the U.S. with eight other countries - India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Bangladesh, Uganda, Ethiopia and China - as accounting for fully half of the world’s population growth by 2050. The U.S. is the only developed country still experiencing third world-like population growth, most of which is due to immigration. It's absolutely imperative that our population be stabilized, and that's impossible without dramatically reining in immigration, both legal and illegal.
If you’re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, I invite you to visit my web site at OpenWindowPublishingCo.com where you can read the preface for free, join in my blog discussion and, of course, purchase the book if you like. (It's also available at Amazon.com.)
Please forgive the somewhat spammish nature of the previous paragraph. I just don't know how else to inject this new perspective into the immigration debate without drawing attention to the book that explains the theory.
Pete Murphy
Author, "Five Short Blasts"
Post a Comment